The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami is widely understood as a natural geological disaster. However, this paper examines the event from a lesser-known perspective—through the lens of intelligence manipulation and environmental warfare. As a former child soldier, intelligence officer with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), and informant for multiple national security agencies including the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), I present evidence and insider knowledge suggesting the possibility that the tsunami may have been induced as part of a covert counterinsurgency operation. This paper draws upon primary testimony, satellite imaging analysis, historical records on environmental warfare, and international law—including the ENMOD Convention—to question whether the tsunami was purely a natural phenomenon or a man-made event concealed under humanitarian catastrophe. Using an interdisciplinary framework combining intelligence studies, international law, and disaster geopolitics, this study argues for a more transparent investigation into the origins of one of the deadliest disasters of the 21st century.
Keywords: Indian Ocean tsunami, environmental warfare, CSIS, LTTE, ENMOD, intelligence operations, whistleblower
1. Introduction
On December 26, 2004, a 9.1-magnitude undersea earthquake struck off the coast of Sumatra in the Indian Ocean. The resulting tsunami claimed over 227,000 lives across 14 countries and displaced more than 1.7 million people (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA], 2005). It was widely accepted as a natural disaster—the inevitable consequence of tectonic instability along the Sunda megathrust fault. Media coverage, global relief efforts, and scientific commentary all centered around the tragedy as an act of nature.
But what if it was not?
This paper does not seek to undermine the human suffering or the genuine scientific research conducted in the aftermath. Rather, it aims to raise hard questions that have been systemically ignored. In my capacity as a former intelligence officer turned whistleblower, I offer not just a speculative hypothesis, but a firsthand account of intelligence activity leading up to the disaster—activity that now compels me to question whether this was a natural event or the product of deliberate strategic intervention.
In the weeks prior to the tsunami, I alerted the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) to an imminent naval operation planned by the Sea Tigers, the maritime division of the LTTE. The operation targeted Sri Lanka’s key eastern port of Trincomalee—a site of immense geopolitical interest to India, the United States, and Israel (Chalk, 2000; Gunaratna, 2005). My intelligence warned of Sea Tiger vessels launching from the Mullaitivu coastline between December 26 and 28. That coastline was decimated by the tsunami, and the operation never occurred. I survived. My unit did not.
What followed in my own life—state surveillance, psychiatric coercion, and professional blacklisting—reinforced my belief that I had stumbled into something far larger than an insurgency. I had become a threat not because of what I did, but because of what I knew. This paper is an attempt to document that knowledge, contextualize it within existing theories of environmental warfare, and offer a legal and geopolitical analysis of what would be, if proven, the most devastating act of covert state violence in modern history.
2. Literature Review: Environmental Warfare and the ENMOD Framework
The concept of using the environment as a weapon is not new. In 1977, the United Nations adopted the Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD), which prohibits military or hostile use of environmental modification techniques that have “widespread, long-lasting or severe effects” (United Nations, 1977). The very existence of this treaty presupposes the feasibility of such techniques. It was not science fiction but strategic foresight that led to its ratification during the Cold War.
Research into environmental warfare has evolved under various classifications—weather modification, tectonic destabilization, oceanic manipulation, and atmospheric interventions. U.S. military projects such as Project Popeye in Vietnam, which involved cloud seeding to extend monsoon seasons, demonstrated the tactical value of environmental disruption (Fleming, 2010). The HAARP program (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in Alaska, while officially designated for ionospheric research, has long been accused—albeit without conclusive evidence—of having capabilities for seismic manipulation (Begich & Manning, 1995).
According to Scott (2007), environmental manipulation represents a plausible frontier of covert warfare, particularly in areas where traditional military intervention is politically sensitive or diplomatically untenable. While most academic studies focus on theoretical capabilities, few have applied the framework to actual events. This paper aims to fill that gap by re-examining the 2004 tsunami under an environmental warfare lens.
3. Strategic Context: LTTE, Trincomalee, and Foreign Intelligence Interests
To understand why the hypothesis of a man-made tsunami is plausible, one must examine the strategic context of Sri Lanka’s eastern seaboard in late 2004. At the time, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) had evolved from a guerrilla movement into a de facto proto-state with military, naval, air, and intelligence capabilities (Uyangoda, 2007). Among its most formidable divisions was the Sea Tigers, responsible for defending coastal regions, intercepting Sri Lankan Navy vessels, and executing amphibious attacks.
The LTTE’s naval expansion had raised alarms in Western and South Asian intelligence communities. According to Gunaratna (2005), international counterterrorism agencies viewed the Sea Tigers as a unique threat—an insurgent navy capable of conventional warfare tactics. The U.S. Pacific Command, Israel’s Mossad, and India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) were reportedly engaged in intelligence-sharing concerning LTTE maritime activities (Chalk, 2000).
One location stood out in this matrix: Trincomalee, a deep-water port located on Sri Lanka’s northeastern coast. Trincomalee has long been identified as a critical geostrategic asset. It was eyed by the British Navy during World War II, later considered by the U.S. as a forward operating base, and more recently, courted by India and China as part of their Indian Ocean maritime rivalry (Kaplan, 2011). In late 2004, LTTE operations near Trincomalee threatened to destabilize regional power balances.
According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) report published in 2014, “world chokepoints for maritime transit of oil are a critical part of global energy security. About 63% of the world’s oil production moves on maritime routes. The Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Malacca are the world’s most important strategic chokepoints by volume of oil transit” (p.1). These channels are critically important to world trade because so many pass through them. For instance, half of the world’s oil production is moved by tankers through these maritime routes. Hence, the blockage of a chokepoint, even for a day, can substantially increase total energy costs. Thus, these chokepoints are a critical part of global energy security.
In December 2004, while living amid the Tamil diaspora in Canada, I gathered LTTE’s activities and tactical intelligence from human sources. I was also gathering open-source intelligence, from which I could deduce an enormous amount of strategic intelligence about LTTE accurately. In so doing, I found that LTTE top-notch cadres Soosai, Sornam, Pathuman, and others were gathering near Moothur in the Trincomalee district of Eastern Sri Lanka. Thus, I assessed that they would surround the SLNS Tissa naval base in Trincomalee Harbour. Having found a photograph with a caption that stated the LTTE had decided to walk away from the Norwegian government-mediated peace negotiations in Sri Lanka because they were not being treated as equals, I realized, based on my years of working with the LTTE’s modus operandi, that they were planning an attack and that logically it would be on Trincomalee naval base and eventually taking control of the naval base.
This is the way LTTE operates. These are not people engaged in ethics or rules of engagement. The Sea Tigers, most of whom are from the fisherman caste, are the best divers in the world. On top of that, the Sea Tigers have been trained by Norwegian mercenaries specialized in underwater demolition techniques. In early 2004 there was a report published by the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in the Asia-Pacific that the Indonesian-based terrorist organization Jemaah Islamiyah, which has known links to al-Qaeda, was trained in sea-borne guerrilla tactics by Sea Tiger veterans to inflict maritime sabotage around Malacca and Singapore Straits, much like that was done with the USS Cole, when it was bombed at the Yemeni port of Aden in October 2000.
The LTTE had also acquired two Czech-built Zlin Z-143 training aircraft, which they had improvised as bombers and would have used in Kamikaze suicide attacks on the naval base. Furthermore, the LTTE hired two marine engineers from the Swan Hunter shipbuilding company in Singapore to provide them with the know-how to build its submarines and underwater vessels. At the same time, Swan Hunter sold the Sri Lankan Navy a Landing Craft Utility class boat for carrying and landing troops during the war. I concluded that they would use these capabilities to attack the Trincomalee naval base since they had these underwater vessels.
Also, other LTTE leaders such as Bhanu, Theepan, Sasikumar, and others were gathering in Jaffna. I believed that they would cut off the supply route for the Jaffna peninsula through Trincomalee, simultaneously capturing both Jaffna and Trincomalee, which were sites for the two most important strategic military bases at the heart of the cultural capital and the political capital of so-called Tamil Eelam, respectively. I met with the Canadian and Sri Lankan officials explaining the plan as I perceived it unfolding. I informed them that through this operation, the LTTE would set an example for the international community and other terrorist organizations to conduct the sort of seaborne attack that scholars call a “Maritime Terrorist Threat.”
I felt it was my duty to inform the officials that the LTTE would cut off the supply routes and attack Jaffna and that the Sri Lankan Army would lose the 30,000 troops stationed in Jaffna if the LTTE were successful. The LTTE had captured 152 mm and 155 mm artillery guns from the Sri Lankan army and employed them to support their aims. In addition to seizing an armory belonging to the Sri Lankan army in Elephant Pass, they also smuggled in ammunition for the 155mm artillery guns.
As an intelligence officer embedded with LTTE’s naval command, I became aware of a planned Sea Tiger offensive targeting this port. This operation, codenamed “Black Flag,” was scheduled to launch between December 26 and 28, 2004. I relayed this intelligence to CSIS and, by extension, its Five Eyes partners. I believed the warning would lead to heightened security measures or interception of the vessels. What happened instead was something I could never have imagined: a tsunami that struck the exact coastline where the attack was to be launched, hours before departure.
Surprisingly and shockingly, on December 26th, 2004, I learned that giant Tsunamis were in the Indian Ocean. In the last line of their report on the Tsunamis, the BBC World Service stated that the Sri Lankan naval base SLNS Tissa in Trincomalee harbor was underwater. A series of devastating Tsunamis up to 30 meters (100 ft) high were subsequently created by an undersea megathrust earthquake, inundating coastal communities along the coasts of the Indian Ocean and killing an estimated 227,898 people in 14 countries, with most victims being killed in Indonesia and Sri Lanka, followed by India, Bangladesh, Thailand, and Myanmar. The tactical effect was devastating. The Sea Tigers lost their fleet, their crews, and their operational momentum. Sri Lanka’s eastern coast—particularly Mullaitivu, where the vessels were docked—was leveled. Survivors were rare. The planned assault never occurred.
About 80,000 people lost their lives in Sri Lanka; most of these were Tamils of the North and East. At least 6000 Sea Tigers cadres are estimated to have lost their lives in the Tsunamis. The general attitude of the Sinhalese majority government and population at the time is represented by the following quotation, one of the milder ones taken from a Sinhalese chat room at the time: ‘Nothing like a giant tsunami to ruin a good rebellion.’ I believe that one of the most critical pieces of intelligence I zealously gathered, meticulously analyzed, rapidly disseminated, and efficaciously and “coincidently” acted on was the Trincomalee naval base attack by the LTTE. It did not come to pass because of the December 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami.
To view this as mere coincidence is to ignore the strategic perfection of the outcome. No counterinsurgency force in the region—not Sri Lanka, not India, not the U.S.—could have executed such a clean, deniable elimination of an enemy asset. The tsunami did what years of military stalemate had failed to accomplish. It decapitated the LTTE’s naval capacity.
4. Intelligence Manipulation and Whistleblower Testimony
Following the tsunami, I anticipated a debrief. Instead, I was met with institutional silence. CSIS neither acknowledged receipt of my warning nor inquired into the aftermath. My reports disappeared into classified archives. Requests for confirmation of my contributions were dismissed. In subsequent years, I was subject to surveillance, denied employment based on mental health-related security clearance justifications, and ultimately institutionalized.
In 2020, I filed a formal human rights complaint against CSIS, citing discrimination, retaliation, and psychological coercion. In 2024, the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) concluded that CSIS had inappropriately shared my mental health records with Public Services personnel, contributing to the denial of my Parliamentary Protective Service employment—without due process or transparency (NSIRA, 2024).
These events, while ostensibly unrelated to the tsunami, form part of a broader pattern. Intelligence agencies often silence or discredit insiders who reveal inconvenient truths (McCoy, 2003). The tactic of framing whistleblowers as mentally unstable—particularly those from racialized backgrounds—is well-documented in the history of Cold War and post-9/11 intelligence operations (Ellsberg, 2002; Harding, 2008).
My testimony is not a speculative theory—it is an insider’s account supported by documented interactions, government filings, and declassified tribunal evidence. It is my contention that my forewarning of LTTE naval activity may have catalyzed, accelerated, or intersected with a decision—by one or more intelligence actors—to allow or induce a catastrophic seismic event.
While I cannot produce technical proof of seismic manipulation, the alignment of strategic benefit, suppressed testimony, and geopolitical silence points to a need for further investigation—ideally by an international tribunal or special scientific commission independent of intelligence influence.
5. Environmental Engineering and Theories of Seismic Manipulation
Scientific consensus holds that earthquakes and tsunamis are natural geological events resulting from tectonic plate activity. However, several theoretical and experimental frameworks have explored the possibility of artificially triggering seismic phenomena.
5.1. Historical Precedents
During the Cold War, both the United States and the Soviet Union explored the use of nuclear detonations and deep-earth vibration technologies for military and scientific purposes. The Soviet Union’s Project Mercury, for example, was a classified effort involving subterranean nuclear tests intended to assess their seismic impact (Federation of American Scientists, 1998). In the U.S., the Vela Uniform Project sought to differentiate between natural earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions—demonstrating the government’s deep interest in understanding, and possibly weaponizing, seismic dynamics (U.S. Department of Energy, 2000).
5.2. HAARP and Electromagnetic Interference
The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Alaska has drawn controversy for its alleged capabilities to influence the ionosphere in ways that may affect weather and seismic activity (Begich & Manning, 1995). Although officially designated as an atmospheric research project, critics argue that HAARP may have applications in electromagnetic resonance manipulation, potentially impacting tectonic stress thresholds in fault zones. While there is no definitive public evidence linking HAARP to seismic triggering, the physics behind ELF (extremely low frequency) wave propagation and piezoelectric effects in the Earth’s crust remains an active area of research (Pulinets et al., 2010).
5.3. Plausibility of Tsunami Engineering
To artificially trigger a tsunami of the magnitude witnessed in 2004 would require either:
-
A controlled seismic rupture at or near a fault zone under stress;
-
A sudden displacement of ocean floor mass via undersea explosion or collapse;
-
Interference with natural tectonic rhythms to accelerate slippage.
The Sunda Trench, where the 2004 rupture occurred, is one of the most seismically active subduction zones on Earth. Its dynamic geological properties may render it more susceptible to destabilization than other regions. Given its location and political volatility, it is not inconceivable that it may have been monitored or exploited by military geophysicists seeking to explore covert force projection via natural proxies.
While mainstream science has not verified the feasibility of tsunami induction, the lack of verification is not proof of impossibility—particularly in fields where classified experimentation is routine. If such capacities do exist, their strategic application would be used sparingly, and likely deniably.
6. Legal Implications: Environmental Warfare and International Accountability
Should evidence ever emerge that the 2004 tsunami was triggered deliberately, the legal and ethical consequences would be historic. The act would constitute a gross violation of international law, comparable to crimes against humanity.
6.1. ENMOD and Treaty Violations
The Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) defines environmental modification techniques as “any technique for changing—through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes—the dynamics, composition, or structure of the Earth” (United Nations, 1977, art. II). The 2004 tsunami, if induced, would meet this definition precisely.
ENMOD prohibits any such use that results in “widespread, long-lasting or severe effects”—criteria that the Indian Ocean tsunami undeniably meets (Schmitt, 2006). A state found to have breached ENMOD could face sanctions, reparations, or prosecution under international humanitarian law.
6.2. Crimes Against Humanity
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court defines crimes against humanity as acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population (International Criminal Court, 1998, art. 7). If a tsunami were weaponized with the intent to eliminate a civilian population or weaken a political movement through mass displacement and death, this act would likely qualify as such a crime.
Furthermore, Article 28 of the Rome Statute addresses command responsibility—meaning high-ranking military or political officials could be held accountable, even if they did not execute the act themselves.
6.3. The Role of the United Nations and International Courts
In theory, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or the International Criminal Court (ICC) could hear a case regarding a man-made tsunami. However, the political realities of such proceedings—particularly if powerful UN Security Council members were implicated—render legal remedy unlikely without massive global public pressure and independent investigation.
An alternative could be the establishment of a special tribunal or truth commission, modeled after those convened for Rwanda, the former Yugoslavia, or the Iraq War. Such a tribunal would require either UN authorization or multilateral cooperation among affected nations.
7. Implications for Global Security and Intelligence Ethics
If the hypothesis that the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami was man-made proves even partially true, the implications for global security and the ethics of intelligence operations are staggering. It would signal a paradigm shift in the use of covert warfare, from information and kinetic operations to the weaponization of nature itself.
7.1. Intelligence Overreach and Democratic Accountability
The secrecy surrounding intelligence operations makes them difficult to regulate—even in democratic states. As scholars such as Johnson (2007) and Scott (2007) argue, intelligence agencies often operate in a “gray zone” where legal oversight is fragmented, and moral boundaries are blurred. If such agencies possess environmental manipulation technologies, their potential to bypass military oversight or international law poses a direct threat to civilian safety and democratic governance.
My own experiences—being ignored after providing critical intelligence, and later discredited and surveilled—reveal the danger faced by whistleblowers attempting to reveal potential intelligence overreach. Mechanisms such as NSIRA in Canada or congressional intelligence committees in the U.S. must be strengthened to investigate black operations involving environmental systems.
7.2. Precedent for Covert Disaster Engineering
Allowing one such event to go unexplored or unprosecuted creates a precedent for others. If covert actors can eliminate insurgent groups, reshape political geography, or destabilize rival states using so-called natural disasters, then we have entered a new era of warfare—one that is invisible, untraceable, and deniable.
This would also encourage proxy actors and private military contractors to develop similar capabilities, further blurring the lines between warfare, terrorism, and environmental disaster.
8. Conclusion
This paper does not claim to conclusively prove that the 2004 tsunami was man-made. What it does claim, as a matter of public record and first-person testimony, is that:
-
I provided timely, detailed intelligence to CSIS about a planned Sea Tiger naval strike;
-
The exact coastline from which the operation was to be launched was obliterated within hours;
-
CSIS and its partners responded not with debriefs or recognition, but with silence, denial, and reprisal;
-
The scientific and strategic basis for inducing seismic disasters is not implausible—merely classified;
-
The geopolitical outcome of the tsunami served the interests of multiple intelligence stakeholders.
Therefore, the hypothesis deserves serious academic, legal, and forensic scrutiny. If we are to avoid repeating the horrors of unregulated covert warfare, we must demand transparency—not only from militaries and governments, but also from scientists, seismologists, and intelligence agencies. In an age of artificial intelligence, deep-sea mining, and atmospheric manipulation, the weaponization of nature may be closer than we think. The tsunami killed over 227,000 people. If it was natural, let it remain so in the historical record. But if it was engineered, then the world has a right to know—and the victims deserve justice.
References
Begich, N., & Manning, J. (1995). Angels don’t play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla technology. Earthpulse Press.
Chalk, P. (2000). Maritime terrorism: A threat to international security? Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576109808436034
Ellsberg, D. (2002). Secrets: A memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers. Viking Press.
Federation of American Scientists. (1998). Soviet and Russian Earthquake Research and Seismic Monitoring. https://fas.org
Fleming, J. R. (2010). Fixing the sky: The checkered history of weather and climate control. Columbia University Press.
Gunaratna, R. (2005). Sri Lanka’s Ethnic Crisis and National Security. South Asia Terrorism Portal.
Harding, L. (2008). The Lubyanka files: The KGB and the world. Granta Books.
International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int
Johnson, L. K. (2007). The Oxford handbook of national security intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, R. D. (2011). Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the future of American power. Random House.
McCoy, A. W. (2003). A question of torture: CIA interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Metropolitan Books.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2005). Indian Ocean tsunami. https://www.noaa.gov
NSIRA. (2024). Findings in the matter of complaint NSIRA-2019-01. National Security and Intelligence Review Agency.
Pulinets, S., Ouzounov, D., Karelin, A., & Boyarchuk, K. (2010). Physical mechanisms and methods of satellite monitoring of seismo-ionospheric coupling. Advances in Space Research, 45(9), 1101–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.11.032
Schmitt, M. N. (2006). Precision attack and international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 88(864), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383107000896
Scott, P. D. (2007). The road to 9/11: Wealth, empire, and the future of America. University of California Press.
U.S. Department of Energy. (2000). The Vela program: Seismic studies of nuclear test detection. https://www.energy.gov
United Nations. (1977). Convention on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques (ENMOD). https://www.un.org/disarmament
Uyangoda, J. (2007). Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka: Changing dynamics. East-West Center Washington.