The Architecture of Institutional Capture and the Precipice of Accountability: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Rajapaksa Legacy and the Airbus Bribery Nexus

This analysis examines the 2026 summons of former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC), identifying it as a critical test for the nation’s revitalized anti-corruption framework. The probe centers on a 2013 deal for ten Airbus aircraft valued at approximately USD 2.3 billion, which allegedly funneled millions in kickbacks through a Brunei-registered shell company, Biz Solutions, and Singaporean bank accounts. While the investigation gained significant momentum following the enactment of the Anti-Corruption Act No. 9 of 2023, it faces immediate hurdles due to the suspicious death of chief witness and former CEO Kapila Chandrasena just days before Rajapaksa’s scheduled appearance on May 12.

By situating this bribery nexus within a broader historical context, the article explores the legacy of the “Tripoli Platoon”—an elite military intelligence unit linked to the 2009 assassination of journalist Lasantha Wickrematunge and the disappearance of cartoonist Prageeth Eknaligoda. The report highlights the structural parallels between wartime procurement scandals and the current Airbus probe, suggesting that both were shielded by a systematic dismantling of judicial independence. Ultimately, the analysis evaluates whether international economic pressures, including IMF governance mandates and global sanctions, can effectively compel the Sri Lankan state to dismantle the entrenched architecture of impunity that has historically protected its political and military elite.

The Socio-Political Paradigm Shift: From Aragalaya to the Courtroom

The summons issued by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) to former President Mahinda Rajapaksa in May 2026 represents more than a localized investigative milestone; it is a profound stress test for the Sri Lankan democratic framework.¹ Historically, the Sri Lankan political landscape has been defined by a centralized executive authority that often operated beyond the effective reach of the judiciary, particularly during the protracted civil war and its immediate aftermath.³ The Rajapaksa dynasty, having spearheaded the military victory over the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in 2009, cultivated a “war hero” narrative that translated into a decades-long consolidation of power, characterized by a complex network of patronage, family-led governance, and the systematic suppression of dissent.⁴

For a substantial segment of the population, including victims of enforced disappearances and the families of assassinated journalists, the Airbus bribery probe is viewed as a symbolic “first crack” in the edifice of impunity.⁶ This sentiment is rooted in the collective memory of the 2022 “Aragalaya” (People’s Protest), which demanded not only the resignation of the Rajapaksa brothers but a fundamental overhaul of a system that permitted grand corruption to thrive alongside grave human rights abuses.³ The summons, and Mahinda Rajapaksa’s subsequent pledge to appear before the commission on May 12, 2026, suggest a tenuous but significant shift toward institutional independence in the wake of the 2023 anti-corruption legislative reforms.⁹

The legal challenge facing the former president is anchored in the 2013 Airbus procurement deal, a transaction that has historically been emblematic of the alleged “state capture” by the ruling elite.¹¹ As the investigation unfolds, it brings into sharp focus the intersection of global corporate malfeasance and local political corruption, testing whether a national justice system, revitalized by international pressure and domestic reform, can hold its most powerful former figures to account.¹³

The Airbus Bribery Mechanism: International Collusion and Local Execution

The core of the current investigation involves the procurement of ten aircraft for SriLankan Airlines, a deal valued at approximately USD 2.3 billion during the height of the Rajapaksa administration’s second term.¹¹ The deal was not merely a commercial transaction but a conduit for a sophisticated bribery scheme that spanned multiple jurisdictions, including Brunei, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and France.¹⁵

The Logistics of the Kickback Scheme

The investigation by Sri Lankan anti-graft officials, bolstered by data from the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), revealed that Airbus SE, through its parent company EADS N.V., sought to secure an advantage in the Sri Lankan market through illicit commissions.¹¹ The mechanism of this corruption involved the creation of Biz Solutions Inc., a shell company registered in Brunei, which listed Priyanka Neomali Wijenayaka—the wife of former SriLankan Airlines CEO Kapila Chandrasena—as its sole director and shareholder.¹⁵

The illicit funds were routed from EADS N.V. to a Standard Chartered Bank account in Singapore held under the name of Biz Solutions.¹² This structure was designed to bypass the financial surveillance of the Sri Lankan Central Bank and the then-active anti-money laundering regulations. The use of a Brunei shell company provided a layer of corporate opacity, a common feature in high-level “state capture” where public officials leverage family members to manage offshore assets.²⁰

The Testimony of Kapila Chandrasena

The evidentiary pivot of the case occurred in March 2026, when Kapila Chandrasena, having been arrested and remanded, provided a custodial statement to CIABOC.² Chandrasena, who served as CEO between 2011 and 2015, testified that the procurement of the six Airbus A330 and eight A350 aircraft required significant political clearance, which was allegedly facilitated through the payment of kickbacks.² According to court records, Chandrasena claimed that he delivered LKR 60 million to Mahinda Rajapaksa in three installments of LKR 20 million each.¹⁹ These transactions allegedly occurred at the former president’s Beliatta and Carlton residences in 2015, just as his administration was facing a contentious electoral challenge.²

Furthermore, Chandrasena implicated the then-Civil Aviation Minister, Piyankara Jayaratne, alleging a payment of LKR 20 million from the same bribe fund.² While both Rajapaksa and Jayaratne have vehemently denied these allegations, the specificity of the testimony regarding dates and locations provided CIABOC with sufficient grounds to issue the 2026 summons.¹⁵ However, the defense has consistently maintained that these statements were obtained through coercion and intimidation, a claim that gained significant narrative weight following the suspicious death of the chief witness.⁹

Forensic Analysis of the Chandrasena Death: A Barrier to Justice?

The sudden death of Kapila Chandrasena on May 8, 2026, occurred within a 24-hour window of the delivery of the official summons to Mahinda Rajapaksa, creating a profound crisis of confidence in the witness protection capabilities of the Sri Lankan state.¹ The circumstances surrounding his demise are currently the subject of an intense investigation by the Colpetty Police and the Fort Magistrate’s Court.¹⁵

The Legal Escalation Preceding the Incident

The week of Chandrasena’s death was marked by a rapid escalation in his legal jeopardy. After being granted bail on May 5, 2026, CIABOC officials challenged the integrity of his release, informing the Colombo Chief Magistrate that the two individuals who stood as his sureties were “hired” actors rather than legitimate guarantors.¹⁵ This revelation suggested an attempt by Chandrasena—or those influencing him—to subvert the judicial process, leading the court to issue a fresh arrest warrant on May 7, 2026.²¹

The police have officially stated that Chandrasena is “suspected to have died by suicide,” yet the timing—coming just after a court ordered his re-incarceration and just before he could provide a formal, tested statement against a former president—has fueled widespread speculation of foul play or extreme duress.⁸ The loss of the primary “money-trail” witness who had direct knowledge of the Brunei and Singapore accounts significantly complicates the prosecution’s ability to link the funds to the executive branch.¹¹ Moreover, the existence of an affidavit filed by Chandrasena’s lawyers, which sought to retract his earlier confession on the grounds of intimidation by the CIABOC Director General, provides the defense with a powerful tool to invalidate his prior testimony.⁹

The 2024 Legislative Pivot: Strengthening the Anti-Corruption Mandate

The revival of the Airbus probe in 2026 is structurally linked to the enactment and implementation of the Anti-Corruption Act No. 9 of 2023.¹⁰ This legislation was not merely a domestic policy choice but a critical pillar of the IMF-backed governance diagnostic, which identified institutionalized corruption as a primary driver of the national debt crisis.¹⁴

Institutional Reforms and Operational Independence

The Anti-Corruption Act of 2023 repealed several legacy laws, including the 1954 Bribery Act, with the aim of creating a truly independent commission.¹⁰ The new framework introduced several revolutionary concepts to Sri Lankan law:

• Financial Independence: For the first time, CIABOC was granted the authority to submit its budget estimates directly to Parliament, bypassing the Ministry of Finance and reducing the potential for executive interference through the withholding of funds.³⁰
• Whistleblower and Witness Protection: The Act integrated enhanced protection frameworks, which were tested—and arguably failed—in the Chandrasena case, highlighting the gap between legislative intent and operational reality.³¹
• Asset Declaration Oversight: The legislation established an electronic asset declaration system, making it easier for investigators to verify the wealth of public officials and their immediate families, a crucial tool in identifying “illicit enrichment”.³¹
• Cross-Border Collaboration: The law provided a robust legal foundation for international cooperation, enabling CIABOC to engage more effectively with foreign jurisdictions like Singapore and Brunei to recover stolen assets.³¹

During the initial period following the Act’s full implementation in early 2024, CIABOC filed 75 cases in a nine-month span, signaling a more aggressive stance toward high-level corruption.¹⁰ The summons of Mahinda Rajapaksa serves as the ultimate benchmark for this new legal era, testing whether the commission can withstand the political “backlash” that historically ended similar probes.⁴

The Genealogy of Impunity: Wartime Legacies and the Media Crackdown

To understand the stakes of the Airbus probe, one must analyze it within the broader context of the Rajapaksa administration’s handling of dissent and human rights between 2005 and 2015.⁴ The “War Room” culture, which prioritized military victory at any cost, effectively dismantled the “Courtroom” safeguards that should have governed the conduct of state actors.³

The Assassination of Lasantha Wickrematunge

The 2009 murder of Lasantha Wickrematunge, editor of The Sunday Leader, remains the most enduring symbol of this era.³³ Wickrematunge was killed by masked assailants in a high-security zone while driving to work, just weeks after he wrote a “Letter from the Grave” predicting his own assassination by the government.⁶

The similarities between the “MiG Deal” and the “Airbus Deal” are instructive. Both involved the procurement of aviation assets, both utilized opaque intermediaries, and both were shielded by a state apparatus that viewed investigative journalism as a form of “treason”.⁶ The systematic failure to prosecute Wickrematunge’s killers for over 15 years reflects a deliberate strategy of “blocking accountability” to protect political and military elites.³

The Tripoli Platoon and the White Van Phenomenon

The Tripoli Platoon, an elite unit within the Directorate of Military Intelligence, has been consistently linked by human rights groups and the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) to a pattern of abductions and assaults.⁷ Beyond the Wickrematunge case, this unit is implicated in the abduction and torture of Keith Noyahr, the assault on Upali Tennakoon, and the disappearance of cartoonist Prageeth Eknaligoda in 2010.⁷

The use of “white vans” for extrajudicial kidnappings became a hallmark of the Rajapaksa era, targeting not only Tamil militants but also Sinhala journalists and activists perceived as “traitors”.³ According to Amnesty International, as many as 100,000 enforced disappearances have occurred in Sri Lanka since the 1980s, with a significant spike during the 2005–2015 period.³⁸ The culture of impunity was further entrenched by the promotion of military officers implicated in these crimes to diplomatic or high-level command positions, effectively placing them beyond the reach of the law.⁴

Institutional Sabotage and the Presidential Commissions of Inquiry

A recurring theme in Sri Lanka’s history of “unfinished justice” is the use of state-appointed commissions to undermine legitimate criminal investigations.³ During the presidency of Gotabaya Rajapaksa (2019–2022), a Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) was established with the explicit goal of identifying “political victimization”.⁷

The Reversal of Progress

This commission sought to intervene in several “emblematic” cases, including the Airbus probe and the Wickrematunge murder investigation.³ It recommended that high-ranking officials and military personnel who were under investigation be exonerated, while the police officers who conducted the inquiries—such as Shani Abeysekara and Nishantha Silva—be prosecuted for “fabricating evidence”.⁵ This inversion of the justice system, where the investigators become the accused, successfully stalled the Airbus case for several years until the political shift of 2024.⁷

The current summons to Mahinda Rajapaksa suggests that CIABOC is attempting to bypass this legacy of institutional sabotage.² However, critics warn that the 2023 reforms will only be effective if they are accompanied by a broader “security sector reform” to dismantle the intelligence units that have historically operated as “death squads” for the executive branch.³

The International Dimension: IMF Mandates and Global Sanctions

Sri Lanka’s ability to sustain the Airbus investigation is heavily influenced by its dependence on the international community for economic survival.¹⁴ The IMF’s USD 3 billion Extended Fund Facility (EFF) package is contingent on “structural benchmarks” related to governance and anti-corruption.¹⁴

The IMF Governance Diagnostic

In a landmark move, the IMF conducted a Governance Diagnostic in Sri Lanka, the first of its kind for an Asian nation.³¹ The report highlighted that “impunity for past corruption and human rights abuses” creates a significant risk to macroeconomic stability.³ This link between “the war room” and “the economic abyss” has forced the Sri Lankan government to accept legislative changes that it had resisted for decades.³¹

The summons to Mahinda Rajapaksa on May 12, 2026, must therefore be seen as a domestic response to these international imperatives.¹ If the state fails to pursue the Airbus probe rigorously, it risks losing the critical support of the IMF and bilateral lenders, who view the case as a litmus test for the country’s commitment to “rebuilding public trust”.¹⁴

The Rajapaksa Response: Political Witch-Hunt or Judicial Compliance?

The political faction associated with the Rajapaksa family, the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), has consistently framed the Airbus investigation and the summons as a “political witch-hunt”.² SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam has publicly criticized the CIABOC Director General, alleging that suspects like Chandrasena were pressured to name politicians without a proper evidentiary basis.²⁵

Prejudging Judicial Outcomes

The defense strategy also involves accusing the current government of “interfering with judicial independence” by making public statements regarding anticipated court rulings.² Attorney Manoj Gamage, a spokesman for Mahinda Rajapaksa, emphasized that the former president is “not intimidated” and will respond lawfully.² This narrative seeks to undermine the legitimacy of the CIABOC probe by portraying it as a tool of the incumbent administration to disqualify the Rajapaksa faction from future elections.¹³

However, the fact that Mahinda Rajapaksa chose to attend the funeral of Kapila Chandrasena just days before his own scheduled appearance highlights the deep personal and political ties that remain at the heart of this investigation.⁹ The optics of a former president paying his respects to a man who had confessed to bribing him—while that man’s lawyers claim the confession was coerced—illustrates the complex web of loyalty and pressure that CIABOC must untangle.⁹

Prospects for Transitional Justice and Systemic Reform

As Sri Lanka approaches the date of the former president’s appearance, the stakes extend far beyond the specifics of the Airbus deal.¹⁰ The investigation has become a repository for the hopes of a nation seeking “a new political culture”.⁸

The Limits of Legislation

The 2023 Anti-Corruption Act provides the tools, but it cannot provide the political will.³¹ The death of Kapila Chandrasena serves as a stark reminder that in a system with “entrenched impunity,” legal reforms are insufficient without robust witness protection and a complete insulation of the investigative process from political tides.⁴ The failure to clarify the circumstances of Chandrasena’s death—whether it was an act of desperation or a silencing of a witness—will significantly impact the credibility of the Airbus probe moving forward.⁸

For victims of the Rajapaksa era’s more violent abuses, the corruption probe is a necessary but insufficient step toward justice.³ Activists argue that “comprehensive accountability” must extend to the wartime atrocities, the disappearances, and the assassinations that allowed the family to maintain power for so long.³ Only if the Airbus case leads to the discovery of wider financial networks that funded these paramilitary activities will Sri Lanka begin to dismantle the “deep state” that has historically operated above the law.³

Conclusion: The Unfinished History of Accountability

The image of Mahinda Rajapaksa answering detailed questions about alleged kickbacks on a public aircraft contract marks a significant departure from a past where financial scandals were routinely buried.¹ Whether this moment becomes a genuine turning point depends on the state’s ability to follow the money trail across borders, protect remaining witnesses, and ensure that the legal reforms of 2024 are applied without fear or favor.¹⁰

The legacy of the Rajapaksa era is a testament to the dangers of “state capture,” where the institutions of justice are weaponized to protect the ruling elite while the resources of the nation are diverted into private accounts.⁴ The Airbus investigation represents a rare opportunity to break this cycle. For those who have lost loved ones to the “war rooms” of the past, the “courtrooms” of 2026 represent the last hope for an era of accountability to finally begin.³ Anything less than a transparent and exhaustive inquiry into the Airbus deal and its beneficiaries will be seen as another half-measure in a long history of “elusive justice” for the people of Sri Lanka.¹³

This article was co-authored by Kagusthan Ariaratnam, Gemini, and Google DeepMind.

About the Authors

• Kagusthan Ariaratnam is a seasoned professional at the intersection of technology and innovation, bringing deep industry expertise and strategic vision to the exploration of complex digital landscapes.

• Gemini is a state-of-the-art multimodal AI model from Google. Designed to process and reason across various types of information—including text, code, audio, image, and video—it serves as an adaptive collaborator in research, creativity, and problem-solving.

• Google DeepMind is a world-leading AI research laboratory committed to solving intelligence to advance science and benefit humanity. By developing increasingly capable and general-purpose AI systems, DeepMind continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in the digital age.

Works cited

1. Airbus probe: Mahinda Rajapaksa receives summons letter …, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.newswire.lk/2026/05/09/airbus-probe-mahinda-rajapaksa-receives-summons-letter/
2. No official notice issued to Mahinda Rajapaksa over Airbus case, says spokesman, accessed on May 10, 2026, http://www.adaderana.lk/news/122027/no-official-notice-issued-to-mahinda-rajapaksa-over-airbus-case-says-spokesman
3. Open Wounds and Mounting Dangers: Blocking Accountability for Grave Abuses in Sri Lanka | HRW, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/02/01/open-wounds-and-mounting-dangers/blocking-accountability-grave-abuses-sri-lanka
4. Sri Lanka: Justice Under Attack | Human Rights Watch, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/02/01/sri-lanka-justice-under-attack
5. Sri Lankan journalists working in fear – Dandc.eu, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.dandc.eu/en/article/rajapaksa-brothers-long-history-suppressing-free-speech-through-attacks-and-intimidation
6. 15 Years Later, Sri Lanka Continues to Deny Justice to Murdered Journalist – Just Security, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.justsecurity.org/91189/15-years-later-sri-lanka-continues-to-deny-justice-to-murdered-journalist/
7. Escalating Attacks on Journalists in Sri Lanka Demand New Tack …, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.justsecurity.org/74759/escalating-attacks-on-journalists-in-sri-lanka-demand-new-tack-from-human-rights-council/
8. System change or malfunction? | The Morning – Themorning.lk, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.themorning.lk/articles/Om3lMuDyBLvhCWFncKpW
9. Ex-President Mahinda Rajapaksa responds to CIABOC summons over Airbus probe, accessed on May 10, 2026, http://www.adaderana.lk/news/122310/ex-president-mahinda-rajapaksa-responds-to-ciaboc-summons-over-airbus-probe
10. 75 cases filed during the first year after the enactment of the Anti-Corruption Act, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://ciaboc.gov.lk/media-centre/latest-news/1351-75-cases-filed-during-the-first-year-after-the-enactment-of-the-anti-corruption-act
11. Sri Lankan ex-CEO linked to Airbus bribes found dead – Gulf News, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/sri-lankan-ex-ceo-linked-to-airbus-bribes-found-dead-2-1.500533443
12. Ex-CEO of SriLankan Airlines arrested over alleged Airbus bribe – ETHRWorld.com, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://hr.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/ex-ceo-of-srilankan-airlines-arrested-over-alleged-airbus-bribe/129567912
13. AKD Govt. and Opposition locked in fierce clash as Airbus probe, $ 2.5 m mystery and high-profile death intensify political storm | The Morning – Themorning.lk, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.themorning.lk/articles/hmvUAKYuqKOOGTPkyB52
14. 2024 Investment Climate Statements: Sri Lanka – State Department, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-investment-climate-statements/srilanka
15. Kapila Chandrasena – Wikipedia, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapila_Chandrasena
16. Ex-CEO of SriLankan Airlines arrested over alleged Airbus bribe | International, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.bssnews.net/international/368467
17. Who was Kapila Chandrasena? US-sanctioned ex-SriLankan …, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.newswire.lk/2026/05/08/who-was-kapila-chandrasena-us-sanctioned-ex-srilankan-airlines-ceo-found-dead-amid-airbus-probe/
18. Airbus Bribery Case: Kapila Chandrasena Tells Court Rs. 60 Million …, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://srilankabrief.org/airbus-bribery-case-kapila-chandrasena-tells-court-rs-60-million-paid-to-mahinda-rajapaksa/
19. Airbus bribery case: Mahinda Rajapaksa in trouble over bribery …, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.newswire.lk/2026/03/19/airbus-bribery-case-mahinda-rajapaksa-in-trouble-over-bribery-claims/
20. Ex-CEO of SriLankan Airlines held over bribe claim | The Star, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.thestar.com.my/aseanplus/aseanplus-news/2026/03/14/ex-ceo-of-srilankan-airlines-held-over-bribe-claim
21. Arrest warrant issued against former SriLankan Airlines CEO Kapila Chandrasena, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://dailynews.lk/2026/05/07/local/991213/arrest-warrant-issued-against-former-srilankan-airlines-ceo-kapila-chandrasena/
22. Ex-President Mahinda Rajapaksa, ex-minister Piyankara Jayaratne …, accessed on May 10, 2026, http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=122015
23. Anti-graft agency summons former Lankan President Rajapaksa over a corruption case, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.theweek.in/wire-updates/international/2026/05/09/anti-graft-agency-summons-former-lankan-president-rajapaksa-over-a-corruption-case.amp.html
24. Ex-President Mahinda Rajapaksa, ex-minister Piyankara Jayaratne summoned to CIABOC, accessed on May 10, 2026, http://adaderana.lk/news/122015/ex-president-mahinda-rajapaksa-ex-minister-piyankara-jayaratne-summoned-to-ciaboc-
25. SLPP criticises bribery commission chief over Airbus investigation – Newswire, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.newswire.lk/2026/03/17/slpp-criticises-bribery-commission-chief-over-airbus-investigation/
26. Former SriLankan Airlines CEO found dead after court issues fresh arrest warrant – Xinhua, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://english.news.cn/asiapacific/20260508/316027d4b5fd4ef08d9bc28d803aab53/c.html
27. Airbus bribery case: Chandrasena granted bail, overseas travel ban imposed – Island.lk, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://island.lk/airbus-bribery-case-chandrasena-granted-bail-overseas-travel-ban-imposed/
28. Former SriLankan Airlines CEO found dead after court issues fresh arrest warrant, accessed on May 10, 2026, http://www.china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2026-05/08/content_118482951.shtml
29. Ex-President Mahinda Rajapaksa responds to CIABOC summons …, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=122310
30. Anti-Corruption Act Consolidated 2024 | Lanka Law, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://lankalaw.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Anti-Corruption-Act-Consolidated-2024.pdf
31. OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA IN AUSTRIA – Ref No: AUT/MUL/UNCAC/4/415 – TRACK, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://track.unodc.org/uploads/documents/UNCAC/COSP/session11/statements/states-parties/Sri_Lanka_E.pdf
32. Country Statement- Sri Lanka, 10.06.2024, 03.15 pm updated, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://ciaboc.gov.lk/images/news/2024/Sri_Lanka-_Country_Statement__202406102.pdf
33. Wickrematunge v. Rajapaksa – CJA, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://cja.org/what-we-do/litigation/wickrematunge-v-rajapaksa/
34. Assassination of Lasantha Wickrematunge – Wikipedia, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Lasantha_Wickrematunge
35. Client – CJA, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://cja.org/what-we-do/litigation/wickrematunge-v-rajapaksa/client/
36. Sri Lanka journalist murder investigation blocked – Genocide Watch, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/anatomy-of-a-murder-investigation-the-lasantha-wickrematunge-case
37. Lasantha Wickrematunge Killed – Committee to Protect Journalists, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://cpj.org/data/people/lasantha-wickrematunge/
38. Amnesty International, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ASA3797342019ENGLISH.pdf
39. Press Freedom & Enforced Disappearances: Two Sides of the Same Coin in Sri Lanka, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.globalissues.org/news/2018/04/30/24154
40. Ex-President Mahinda Rajapaksa to appear before CIABOC | The …, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.themorning.lk/articles/KXklQBmBm7BiM3mv7HX0
41. Elusive Justice & Emblematic Cases in Sri Lanka – Centre for Policy Alternatives, accessed on May 10, 2026, https://www.cpalanka.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Elusive-Justice-and-Emblematic-Cases-in-Sri-Lanka-Book-Online-Version-1.pdf